Remove duplicate workflow #197
Conversation
WalkthroughThe PR adds GitHub repository configuration files for code ownership and pull request template guidelines, while removing an outdated automation workflow that previously managed bounty tracking, leaderboard generation, contributor onboarding, and Discord notifications. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Comment |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
1-15: LGTM! Template covers essential PR elements.The pull request template is well-structured with appropriate sections for Summary, Type of Change, Checklist, and Testing. The use of "Fixes #XXX" in the checklist is good practice for automatic issue linking.
For future enhancement, you might consider adding:
- Additional change types (e.g., breaking change, refactor, performance improvement)
- Expanded checklist items (e.g., security considerations, backwards compatibility, changelog updated)
- More detailed testing guidance (e.g., unit tests, integration tests, manual testing)
However, the current minimal template is perfectly adequate for the project's needs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks).github/pull_request_template.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/automation-old.yml(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/automation-old.yml
| # Auto-assign reviewers | ||
| * @mikejmorgan-ai | ||
| cortex/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai | ||
| tests/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai | ||
| docs/*.md @mikejmorgan-ai |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Remove redundant path-specific assignments.
The global wildcard pattern on line 2 already assigns @mikejmorgan-ai to all files. Lines 3-5 redundantly assign the same reviewer to specific paths, which violates the DRY principle and adds unnecessary maintenance overhead.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant assignments:
# Auto-assign reviewers
* @mikejmorgan-ai
-cortex/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai
-tests/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai
-docs/*.md @mikejmorgan-aiIf you need different reviewers for specific paths in the future, you can add them back at that time.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Auto-assign reviewers | |
| * @mikejmorgan-ai | |
| cortex/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai | |
| tests/*.py @mikejmorgan-ai | |
| docs/*.md @mikejmorgan-ai | |
| # Auto-assign reviewers | |
| * @mikejmorgan-ai |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/CODEOWNERS lines 1-5: the file currently assigns @mikejmorgan-ai
globally with '*' and then redundantly repeats the same reviewer for
cortex/*.py, tests/*.py, and docs/*.md; remove lines 3-5 so only the global
wildcard assignment remains to eliminate duplication and maintenance overhead;
if future path-specific reviewers are needed, add explicit entries then.
* Add PR automation (CODEOWNERS + template) * Remove duplicate automation workflow --------- Co-authored-by: Mike Morgan <allbots@allbots.io>
Cleanup
Summary by CodeRabbit
Note: This release contains only internal infrastructure updates with no user-facing changes or new features.